Thread: Einstein?
View Single Post
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2007, 13:43
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,144
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: Einstein?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry_222 View Post
The tube placement by 177 was a great strategic move I am not demeaning that in any way, but I don't think the tube had any effect on 179 not climbing 71's ramps.
It was 987 that pushed that tube on. And no, it probably didn't have a physical effect on 179's ramp climbing ability, but it apparently had a psychological effect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swampdude
The tube did not block us, but it did mess with our drivers (Sean) head.
We can go on forever debating this, however, I invite you to look at the facts: this has been an option for at least the past two years. We know of a number of people that have through of this strategy, and yet it has never been used. If it becomes a problem, I would assume FIRST would fix it. But as I see it, there is no problem, and no reason to change it.

Just as an aside, has a replacement ever been used on Einstein?
__________________