Thread: Einstein?
View Single Post
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-04-2007, 12:00
ScoutingNerd175's Avatar
ScoutingNerd175 ScoutingNerd175 is offline
Scouting Away
AKA: Caroline Marr
FRC #0175 (Buzz Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 231
ScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud ofScoutingNerd175 has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to ScoutingNerd175
Re: Einstein?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eugenebrooks View Post
A robot with an arm ripped off is not inoperable, it can still play
defense. A robot with a lift that comes up 1/4 inch short of
12 inches can still lift a pair of robots 4 inches and score 30 points
doing it. This is far from inoperable. If your robot could not roll
around on the carpet, I would call it inoperable.
I am not commenting on whether or not I feel that this strategy is okay. However, at least as far as robots with ripped of arms go, we have seen robots with broken arms and that sort of thing be replaced many times in the past few years. At BAE in 2005, we were the alliance captain and our arm was broken, we decided to ask for a replacement, which was allowed even though our robot could still drive. (This is only one example, but there are many) So I don't believe that any rules about the robot being completely inoperable have ever been enforced. I don't know about robots which are still in the condition that they were in when they were drafted.
__________________
Buzz 175 Alumna

University of Michigan, Class of 2012
Syracuse University, Class of 2010
Enrico Fermi High School, Class of 2006