View Single Post
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-04-2007, 12:27
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 248
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Are two speed transmissions worth it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Teams should analyze the game each year before they make a decision on the transmission or other parts of the robot. There are years in which two speeds are optimum and other years single speed is best. The same can be said for treads, crab drive, multi-wheel or omni-wheels, large diameter or small diameter, aritculated arms, etc. In a defensive game, low speed pushers may be best. In a game where a robot must travel a distance often than high speed might be best. In a year where you might climb a ramp, a high speed only box may not work. There is no hard and fast rule on this decision. Analyze, brain storm and play the game with miniatures or team members playing the robot parts. Use your technology wisely.
Well said, Al. We've used the AM two speed transmissions with pneumatic shifter the past two years and have been very satisfied with their performance and ours. We benefitted from the flexibility of two speeds in both games. I am quite confident that we would not have enjoyed the same success with a compromised single speed.