|
Re: How do you feel about how the Auto desk award winners were deiced?
I definetly agree that how something looks or is packaged can help make a sucessful engineering product. I think that the controversy (at least in my team), is that the Inventor award is supposed to be for technical excellence. If Autodesk wants to include that a portion of each entry's score is based upon how well they've packaged their design (which I think is a great idea, as the world gets more globalised and more competative, we all should learn some marketing skills), that's fine. I think what we're having a problem with is that we're not sure whether we should be marketing our design, or even what criteria we're truly being judged on during peer voting, since everyone has a different set of criteria.
__________________
~Go Socceroos!~
Proud Young Adult Mentor of: (2006-7) Team 530 - The Nano Ninjas! ttclegoleague.tridenttech.edu
Runners up for 2006-2007 SC Champion's Award!!!
(2005-6) Team 164 - The Beach Busters: 2006 SC DIRECTOR'S AWARD WINNERS!!!!!!
(2004-5) Team 24 - The Incredibotz: Team Spirit, & 3rd Place Robot Performance
Proud Former Member of:
(2003-4) Team 1425 - Marz Botz: 2004 SC State Director's Award!
(2002-3) Team 1048 - City Botz: 2004 SC State Director's Award Runner Up
|