Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam
See this is where the ref's job is so hard. It’s totally a judgment call. I think 177 was clearly using their arm for defense outside the bumper zone in that match and they should have received a 10 point penalty, but other see it as incidental contact. Which is correct? Maybe both.
Whatever the ref rules somebody is going to be unhappy.
Anybody want that job?
|
if infact it was incidental contact it should have only happened once. i counted 4 seprate incidents in that one match from 177 against 233