|
Re: Did anyone else see it this way?
i watched the video only once. i did that so i can base my opinion off of, like a ref, only seeing the match once. (i got this idea from some one over in the now closed curie discussion) here is my opinion:
I see that 177s arm never moved, therefore they didnt intentionaly contact 233 outside the bumper zone. 233s arm was moving back and forth, sometimes in the bumper zone sometimes not. they both contacted eachother outside the bumper zone. so, in theory, they both should have gotten one. but i think the ref seen tat and decided to negate both penalties. Thats what i saw that one and only time i watched the match.
i think the ruling on this match was fair.
my $0.02
__________________
my FIRST acomplishments: 2003:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, Archimedes Division winner, National Champion (w/ 111 and 469) 2004:MWR Finalist 2005:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, MWR Innovation in Controls award 2006:hmmm wow, umm we got picked 4th overall at Nats by 121
my FIRST resume: 65 (2003-2006)
|