View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2007, 03:44
Jeffrafa's Avatar
Jeffrafa Jeffrafa is offline
Robotics Addict
AKA: Jeff Lewis
FRC #1425 (Error Code)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Wilsonville, OR
Posts: 165
Jeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant future
Re: Did anyone else see it this way?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisrobin View Post
During the drivers meeting I heard the Ref say that it was OK to try to knock a tube out of another robots grasp. It was NOT OK to grab the tube. If two robots became entangled it was incumbent on both of them to try to become disentangled. If one of them fell over, the other was probably going to be turned off for the rest of the match. The penalties I rememeber them stressing was from a full speed ramming run from 5 feet or more away (even in autonomous mode) and grabbing a tube in another robot's possession. I got the feeling they weren't going to call penalties for robot arms touching, incidental or otherwise.
I just wish we had had the chance to use some desperate and questionable tactics on Einstein. Not that we would have...

Chris
This was the biggest thing I got out of the driver's meeting. Basically, the way I understood it they said that unless something was extremely excessive, no penalties would be called on extension contact until someone tipped - then a 10 point penalty would likely be assessed. Obviously grabbing a tube was still out of line, but until somebody tipped it was fair game.

I was actually more surprised when 1270 was DQ'd for tipping 71 in the semifinal match. I wasn't watching when it happened, but I expected nothing more than a 10 point penalty - but it was just a judgment call on whether or not it was 'excessive' play.

(Chris mentioned that he understood it was a DQ for tipping, which would fit for this, but we had a qualifying match in which 217 was tipped and we were only assessed a 10pt penalty, although there was absolutely no hitting high )

- Jeff