I've debated this quite a few times about what side of the fence I want to be on for this one. From personal experiences, I've summed up that grades ARE important.
As with any other extracurricular at our school, our minimum participation requirement 2.0. I completely understand the reasoning behind this. Besides the band, our team misses the most school out of any group. I suppose in this sense we are using GPA as a measure of responsibility. Regardless of the learning situation, you should strive to do your best, thus a 2.0 is not out of anyone's reach on our team. Most of the time it is just laziness and not lack of knowledge. With our minimum requirements, we are not preventing opportunities, but simply ensuring that we have a team of quality members.
As far as the team is concerned, students are usually only held back if a teacher or parent notes that the student is falling behind. We make it clear that it is the responsibility of the student to make up all missed work and settle all discrepancies with their teachers. I do admit that the build season has an effect on grades, and that is understandable (my grades dropped almost a whole letter grade between Jan and April, but I'm finally getting back up to an A average again), but in the end, school is more important. I've been on trips where it seems as if some people have packed more books and homework than clothes, but you do what you need to do. It's hard, but the rewards are worth it.
I have lost the respect of a teacher or two along the way for my dedication to robotics and not fully to their classes, but I've recently gained it back
. Many teachers don't see the value of FIRST, and they have little sympathy if you dare mention the word robotics, therefore we need students to keep up the good rep of the program by maintaining their grades. Having students with the highest GPAs in the school and outside success looks great to the administration, rather than a bunch of students with a massive amount of practical knowledge, but nothing but a robot to prove it.
I think that the combined success of academics and robotics is more rewarding that just one or the other. Sure, I can say that I have learned more about physics in robotics than in school, but being able to say that I've done so without sacrificing my grades feels SO much better. It's the same the other way around too. Sure, I might have had straight As, but I didn't get to enjoy anything else. A C+ or B won't hurt much for one quarter.
-No L