|
Re: pic: Spread of US FIRST Teams
A very interesting map.
Where you have conglomerations of teams (NE coast, SE Mich, CA cities, etc.) have the dots been offset so they all show up?
I'm thinking the conglomerations correspond more to population than to distance from regionals, with some very strong correlation to sponsors (Mich and KC, for example).
The map also shows potentials for growth - Louisville, Nashville and Memphis, for example.
Good work. Dots of another type coming your way.
__________________
(since 2004)
|