View Single Post
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2007, 23:27
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,526
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: The Future of FIRST: BaneBots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Peshek View Post
I personally build combat robots. Although it may seem like the robots are smashed together and you hope the parts don't break, generally we try to engineer them so they don't break and last more than a whole competition (6ish fights if you go all the way). An article in this months SERVO actually talks about the engineering aspect of building the robots not to break.

I know if I put any part on my robots; gearboxes, electronics, anything I expect for what I paid for, I should get more than one competition out of them. Generally I like to get 4-5 competitions before I start replacing parts, although I have has some of my parts for 3 years now that still work.

Unfortunately I don't think the 56mm gearboxes will get tested in combat robots, due to the fact that motors such as Magmotors as included in battlekits.com will always out push these (based on my experience, not any real math behind that), but I'm thinking of incorporating these into my next combat robot to test the durability of these gearboxes.

The magmotors that I have seen are significantly more powerful (and expensive) than a small CIM.