View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-05-2007, 11:39
EHaskins EHaskins is offline
Needs to change his user title.
AKA: Eric Haskins
no team (CARD #6 (SCOE))
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Elkhorn, WI USA
Posts: 998
EHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to EHaskins
Re: Laser Rangefinders

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidGitz View Post
Actually there are two ways of doing it without using triangulation. You can measure the time delay, assuming the processor is fast enough. The speed of light is 3*10^8 meter/second. If you have a 80MHz clock on your processor (Propellor with an external clock), that means your step distance is 3.75 meters per cycle (and a minimum distance of 3.75 meters too), plenty close for me, since I will be using UltraSonic's for close distances that work up to 6 meters. The other method is to modulate the laser with a frequency, then you can determine the distance using the properties of the Doppler effect, as long as you're relatively moving
You would need a much faster processor than that. You couldn't possibly process the signal every cycle.

I'm just curious what are you building?
__________________
Eric Haskins KC9JVH