Thread: How do you feel about how the Autodesk award winners were decided?
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-06-2007, 20:45
Joe G.'s Avatar
Joe G. Joe G. is offline
Taking a few years (mostly) off
AKA: Josepher
no team (Formerly 1687, 5400)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,453
Joe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Joe G.
Re: How do you feel about how the Autodesk award winners were decided?
I really like the idea of having FIRST participants vote, but obviously the team size issue is a problem. So here are my four ideas:

1. Limit voting to something like five per team, so that larger teams don't have a advantage, but also allows some individuality

2. Instead of voting "that one is the best," rank them from one to five.

3. DEFINATLY have the award at the regional level, as Hachiban VIII said "to give the little guy a chance"

4. I'm not sure if this is practical, but maybe move the award submision dedline back a few days. Many teams simply don't have enough members so that a few people can be fully dedicated to Inventor work during the build season.