View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-06-2007, 13:35
whytheheckme's Avatar
whytheheckme whytheheckme is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jacob Komar
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,320
whytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond reputewhytheheckme has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to whytheheckme Send a message via AIM to whytheheckme Send a message via MSN to whytheheckme Send a message via Yahoo to whytheheckme
Re: Computer Speed Loss

Quote:
Originally Posted by EHaskins View Post
I'm not sure how familiar you are with Vista's power management, but I'm fairly sure that if Windows sees the processor as being slower than it really is then it won't allow it to run at full speed. I believe this isn't a problem in earlier versions, because they didn't try to regulate the CPU speed like Vista does.
I did not know that Vista trys to manage your processor's power. Good info.

That is really unfortunate, in many regards. That means that you can only ever run something as fast as Vista sees your processor being. I wonder if that prevents you from over-clocking it (like if Vista just reads the processor and knows how fast it should be, or if it trys to clock it itself.) Not to mention you can usually squeeze a few extra processes per second out of a processor than that which is advertised.

Ugh. Vista.

Well, thanks Eric for the info on Vista's new 'power management'.

Jacob
Reply With Quote