View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-07-2007, 20:14
Alex.Norton's Avatar
Alex.Norton Alex.Norton is offline
Fidgetting
no team
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Ft. Collins, Colorado
Posts: 190
Alex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Alex.Norton Send a message via MSN to Alex.Norton
Andymark Planetary

I'm working on a design for a gear box for the CIMs that would use the gears out of the am planetary (the one for the Fischer price) and I have a couple of questions concerning it.

1. Perhaps the more important is how much torque can the gears in the am planetary take. If I were the put two CIMs worth of torque into my gear box and mount a 6 inch wheel to the output shaft of the gear box would I have wonderful grinding noises? The reduction through the gearbox will be around 15:1 and the planetary will be the last stage on the reduction.

2. The other question revolves around a disparity on the andymark site and determines a fairly significant part of my design. the site says that the reduction through the planetary is 3.67:1 and the the sun gear has 15 teeth. This would mean the ring gear has 55 teeth and that isn't acceptable geometry for a planetary. The CAD model does has a sun gear of 15 teeth but the ring gear only has 40 teeth giving a reduction of 2.67 which makes it harder for me to get the reduction I want. So if somebody who knows could tell me which one that would be very helpful.

Thanks.