I felt like doing some programming, so I updated the
CORDIC math library I posted a few years ago.
I made a few changes such as returning both the sine and cosine values instead of throwing one away (since CORDIC calculates both at once), and downgrading from 24-bit math to 16-bit math in the interest of speed. However, the biggest change is that the library is now written in PIC assembly instead of C, since I was curious to see if there was any speed advantage to be had.
I did some speed testing by calling the function as many times as possible in one Process_Data_From_Master_uP() loop before the RC crashed. The assembly implementation of the sin_cos() function took 4500 calls to crash while the C implementation took 1800 calls; the atan2_sqrt() function took 4700 and 1900, respectively. So it seems that the assembly implementation is about 2.5 times faster than the C implementation.
Any questions or comments are welcome.