View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-08-2007, 14:49
Unsung FIRST Hero
Waynep Waynep is offline
217 Alum, Former 395/348 Mentor
FRC #1923 (MidKnight Inventors)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 199
Waynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond reputeWaynep has a reputation beyond repute
Re: So you think you want an accelerometer

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
A couple of servers are down at the moment here at work, so my usual news-site stumbling revealed this little gem of an article:

http://www.physorg.com/news104502773.html

In it, the author describes how university professors use a bluetooth interface to a Wii remote to calculate positioning of a pendulum based upon the accelerometer and IR sensor output of the Wii.

A Wii remote retails for $39.99 and includes all 3 axes of output data plus and IR sensor data you can use as a (dynamic, non-static!) reference point:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1158316638167

The accelerometer that comes with the kit of parts costs $30 if you buy 1000 of them at a time and includes a single-axis sensor with a signal processor that determines the difference based upon the sensor's never-to-change initial state.
http://www.analog.com/en/prod/0%...C00.html#price

For a second, let's ignore the fact that currently there exists no bluetooth interface for our current robot controller. It is possible that in the future we will be able to interface to it in a much more intuitive and/or complex manner than we have now.

I do believe that the future holds a bit more for COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) products than anyone has realized. Would you go for the Wii for it's 3-axes + IR sensor for an extra $40 or are you happy with a generic, single-interface design that's provided for us every year? I ask this question with on-robot feedback control loops in mind rather than a human-robot interface controller
.
Jesse,
This is a great topic of discussion. What other COTS items are you thinking of? Assuming that we may have an improved interface in the future what would be on your wishlist? Furthermore, what capabilities/functions would you want the control system to have? With rumors of a substantial change, I think the powers that be at FIRST are probably perusing threads like these for ideas to incorporate into the next generation control system. We should let it be known what we're hoping for since we’re the end user.
-wayne
__________________
395 2TrainRobotics
Regional Champs- '03 VA, '05 PIT, '05 NY, '06 PIT, '06 NY; Regional Finalist- '04 NY; Engineering Inspiration- '03 NY, '06 PIT; Regional Chairman's Award- '04 NY
348 Norwell Robotics
2008 NY Regional Finalist; 2008 Curie Division Champs; 2008 World Championship Finalists
1923 MidKnight Inventors
2009 NJ Regional Champs; 2010 BOS Engineering Inspiration Award; 2011 CT Regional Champs, Gracious Professionalism Award, Coopertition Award