Quote:
Originally Posted by InfernoX14
It's not as if this song is the aural representation of FIRST and it is completely contradicting the ideals of FIRST. It's not as if that one line in the chorus is completely twisting the minds of FIRSTers everywhere such that they become rude people. It's just a victory song. It has been for years. It has become a tradition to play that song at the end of a tournament/competition/etc.
There are other songs that go against the ideals of FIRST that get played at competitions. Another Brick in the Wall, Part 2 comes to mind...
|
Waitaminute.... the song is exactly that: an aural representation of FIRST. It's not an aural representation of
the entirety of FIRST, but everything we do, including the songs we play at our competitions, represents FIRST in some way, however small.
You extrapolate from one to infinity in the influence any song might have on FIRSTers, and you may want to reconsider this, seeing how it's one of the most baseless arguments one can make. If the song has a negative influence that outweighs the positive benefit by any amount, it should be removed and we should find something better.
Tradition is also one of the lamest excuses for inexcusable behavior. Bad things don't get better just because you do them over and over again. In 1776, we broke tradition into teensy little pieces, because a group of people got together and realized that the tradition was no good.
What exactly is your response to the hypothetical I raised, which almost directly quotes from the song? I don't hear anything meaningful.