Thread: Air Cannon
View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2007, 12:05
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Air Cannon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat A. View Post
I don't think a total rejection of heavy wall PVC is warrented. Schedule 40 is rated for 200 psi and that's a conservative number (probable factor safety of 2). Household water pressures can run 70 psi (think of all the pvc used without a problem, i.e. water exploding from pipes) and I know of businesses using PVC tubing for compressed air running 120 psi.
It's actually against OSHA guidelines to use PVC for any kind of (non-buried) compressed gas use.

And easier way to think of the PVC vs. non PVC debate for air cannons is to compare acrylic to Lexan. We all know that acrylic may work for many uses on our robots, but we one needs to baby it in order to prevent it from cracking and shattering. If they used Lexan on the other hand, they don't have to worry as much about catastrophic shattering.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote