Thread: Air Cannon
View Single Post
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-08-2007, 12:27
Pat Arnold's Avatar
Pat Arnold Pat Arnold is offline
I think I over-think things...
FRC #1557 (12 Volt Bolt)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Eustis, FL
Posts: 209
Pat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond reputePat Arnold has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Air Cannon

Quote:
Originally Posted by artdutra04 View Post
It's actually against OSHA guidelines to use PVC for any kind of (non-buried) compressed gas use.

And easier way to think of the PVC vs. non PVC debate for air cannons is to compare acrylic to Lexan. We all know that acrylic may work for many uses on our robots, but we one needs to baby it in order to prevent it from cracking and shattering. If they used Lexan on the other hand, they don't have to worry as much about catastrophic shattering.
The comparison given is very helpful; I was unfamilar with OSHA's PVC use restrictions. ABS is clearly the better choice.

Since MARS can not meet the school's team liability insurance requirement, there are no current plans to remake or publicly use our launcher.

One additional safety consideration we had with our design was preventing someone being shot pointblank or directly, so we mounted it at an approx. 45 degree angle on our 2005 bot and discussed use of a remote enabler that an adult would control.

The launcher was a fun summer building project; liability issues, probably more than the build, have opened eyes about all the stumbling blocks encountered when trying something new.
Reply With Quote