|
Re: Quad Quandary Strategies
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Wizard
Does anybody know if its legal to make a robot that does nothing but eat enemy rings? If so, that would be a good strategy to use if the metagame is centered around offensive robots.
|
Its against gracious professsionalism, but I cannot find a rule against this. Either way, unless you could manipulate the goals as well, you would be completely reliant on your alliance partner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred
Of course, every team in FTC should be asking the magic question: "What would Simbotics do?" (Yes, this is a direct rip of Professor Grady's wisdom--but I don't think the comparison is unfounded.)
|
ROFL, true dat. Borrowing from Andy Grady, this year simbotics will score all ringers in autonomous and spraypaint the other alliance's rings to their own color just to stack more points. Speaking of stacking, their robot will stack all 3 goals and place them on their alliance area. They probably already finished building their robot, so we should probably hurry a bit.
__________________
In 2006
Team Name: 3652 FLAME
Michigan VEX Competition WINNERS
Pennsylvania VEX Competition WINNERS
Atlanta World Championships Runner-up alliance
Only team to win two regionals in 2006
In 2007
Team Name: 478 Mustang Robotics and 163 UHS Robotics
Events:
Toronto FTC Competition - Finalists (478, 163, 298)
MA FTC Competition - Winners! (738, 478, 427)
Last edited by fredliu168 : 09-23-2007 at 05:06 PM.
|