View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-09-2007, 23:19
eugenebrooks eugenebrooks is offline
Team Role: Engineer
AKA: Dr. Brooks
no team (WRRF)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 601
eugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Opinions wanted: LabView-based controller?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Flowerday View Post
I
Out of curiosity, I went to Monster.com and did some job searching for Chicago. "C" is unfortunately a terrible search term so I searched for 3 things: "c++", "java", and "labview". Java generates 674 hits, C++ generates 294, and LabView generates 5. Take that as you may.
And "C/C++" gets 1624 hits over this way...

Lets get serious guys, if we want to teach programming in our FIRST activities
a high performance a C environment on a more powerful processor (with a nice
debugger hookup) is the answer. The "higher level" environments are great for
teams without good programming mentors, as noted by posters in this thread.
If FIRST decides, for whatever reason it might, that we should be teaching LabVIEW
(LabVIEW is heavily used and taught for lab use where I work), then one is going
to have to round up a large number of new LabVIEW mentors (not programming
mentors) to do that. This [potential?] decision is neither good, nor bad, it only has
consequences...

Eugene

Last edited by eugenebrooks : 25-09-2007 at 23:32.