|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Connecticut "Double Regional"
I think that I would rather a super regional. The double awards could pan out to be a good idea but you don't need a double regional to decide on two Chairman's Award winners. I much rather the varied field of play gained from a larger regional, speaking from experience of both small and large regionals. The only downside to a large regional is the greater competition to the choice awards and the relatively small number of qualifying rounds. These could be solved with double awards and a double field setup.
|