View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-10-2007, 17:04
robosteve robosteve is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Worcester
Posts: 12
robosteve is a splendid one to beholdrobosteve is a splendid one to beholdrobosteve is a splendid one to beholdrobosteve is a splendid one to beholdrobosteve is a splendid one to beholdrobosteve is a splendid one to behold
Re: Worcester FIRST event?

I don't really get that letter- it doesn't answer either of the two main questions I have
If QCC told FIRST in September they were planning on holding a FTC Champiionship again, then why didn't FIRST tell them before the game was unveiled and before QCC held their FTC kickoff? Seems if this letter was right, then FIRST would have told them at that point that they weren't going to let QCC be an affiliate partner again.

More important,this letter doesn't answer the main question. Did Mr. Chism tell the QCC lady at any point that where her son worked was part of the reason QCC wouldn't be a partner or not? I find it hard to believe she made that up, and if he didn't say that to her, then why didn't he personally write the letter and say it isn't true. Mrs. Morrison, are you saying that Mrs. Lauer made that up and that her son working for IFI had nothing to do wtih QCC not being a partner? That is the answer I'd like to hear.
This whoel thing seems dumb to me- if other states have multiple partners,why can't ours? If QCC was willing to hold an FTC event for our teams, why would FIRST say no? Explain that. Do they not want more teams? None of the FIRST letter makes sense to me, just looks like spin. Oh well- at least we still get to play either way.
Reply With Quote