Thread: The Society for More Qualifying Rounds
View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:05
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I agree . .but it doesn't have to be THAT bad . .
Posted by Dan, Student on team #10, BSM, from Benilde-St. Margaret's and Banner Engineering.

Posted on 3/15/99 5:40 PM MST


In Reply to: One more thing... posted by Chris on 3/15/99 4:23 PM MST:



I do agree that a team going to more than one regional has an advantage, but I see no reason to stop this. This isn't just a competition, it's a learning experience. And if more kids can go to more competitions then FIRST gets more cash and more kids learn, who cares if a "rich" team will get some more practice.
But since space is becoming an issue at regionals, regional teams should take a priority. What I mean is that each team can choose 1 regional which they are pretty much guarenteed (unless a lot choose the same regional). Then after that, the only way they can get into other regionals is if there is space. So this way each team will have their 1st pick of regionals and no multi-regional team will displace a local team. Makes total sense to me.
:-Dan



: I'm sure this won't win me a lot of friends, especially considering the host of this site, but here it goes...

: I think each team should be limited to one (and MAYBE two) regionals MAX. This is for a variety of reasons, two of which I'll share here:

: 1. The regionals are becoming way over crowded. If you want more qualifying matches (which I definitely do), the only way to get this is by reducing the number of teams. Another point: if teams that only get to go to one regional and that regional happens to be the Great Lakes Regional, that team is only guaranteed 10 matches between the regional and nationals. That is very little reward for all of the work that went into the project. It would be nice to play more matches.

: 2. Big Money = Big Winners? Is this what FIRST is all about? A team that can afford to go to multiple regionals is at a HUGE advantage. It essentially gives these teams more time with their robot (beyond the six weeks). First, the drivers get much more practice at the regional. Second, the team gets to debug the robot at the regional. Third, the team gets the robot for 72 hours after the regional for more practice and work. A team that goes to multiple regionals can do terribly at the first regional and by time nationals comes along, they could be one of the best teams. On the other hand, a team with less money may only go to one regional and miss out on all of the practice and debug time and will end up being an also-ran at the nationals.
: In other words, one team may actually have better engineers, builders, drivers, etc. but it won't be seen because other teams get much more time.

: If FIRST continues to allow teams to attend as many regionals as they wany, they at least should give everyone their robot for 72 starting on Saturday night following every regional. This would allow the small money teams a better shot at competing.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.