View Single Post
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2007, 17:16
Mr.G Mr.G is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin
FRC #0326 (Xtreme Eagles / Romulus High School / General Motors)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Romulus
Posts: 244
Mr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Mr.G
Re: Opinions wanted: LabView-based controller?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Hibner View Post
More recently, products have been developed to "cut out the middle man" (i.e. the software engineer) and automatically generate the C code from the block diagrams. This has the very large benefits of: a) the code should theoretically be 100% bug free, and b) requires virtually zero man-hours to create the code.
Chris, I never tought of it that way and I think LabVIEW does eliminate a lot of C coding and syntax.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
Isn't it also possible to integrate Matlab algorithms into LabView? Aren't they pretty much one in the same? I seem to remember our LabView expert in college take our optical system that we had in Matlab and adapt it to LabView without much pain.
In my 12 years I haven't come across anything that you couldn't integrate to or communicate with using LabVIEW.