Thread: Parallel Tanks
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2007, 11:15
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,964
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Parallel Tanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamC View Post
Is there a way to hook up your air tanks in parallel, as opposed to series? I understand that the benefits of wiring circuits in parallel, but I doubt it applies to air systems. I would think that the moment a failure occurs in a line that is not cut off by a solenoid, the system would immediately decompress. Any elaboration on this would be very welcome.
Because gas expands to fill the area, any leak will cause a (nearly) uniform drop in the entire system, barring restrictions within the system. Thus you are correct that any failure in the integrity of the system would depressurize the entire system.

The only advantage to a parallel tank setup could be in flow rate as there is a larger effective orifice (2 tubes rather than 1). But that would require a double setup all the way through the (2) regulators (which may be against FIRST robot rules).
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses