Thread: We Rejected Wild Stang
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:15
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: We Rejected Wild Stang
Posted by Brandon Rigg, Student on team #135, Penn High School & Capitol Technologies, from Penn High School.

Posted on 3/28/99 6:00 PM MST


In Reply to: We Rejected Wild Stang posted by Brandon Rigg on 3/28/99 5:49 PM MST:



And another thing, with there being 16 teams in the finals at nationals.
You would have to be 17th or below to be picked by one of the top 16. The
best teams will not be below 16. There were some good teams at Great Lakes
from 9 top 16 (my team was in that range). Let's say wild stang wanted beatty (#71),
which they did, because beatty was borderline, and barely got 8th. At nationals,
beatty would have to get 17th to get picked by wild stang. They are not
gonna throw qualifying matched!!!!! we were in an alliance with them
on friday and our goal that round was a 540. We didn't get that, but we still did a
good job. People aren't gonna throw matches to get into 17th or lower place, you
would have to lose too much, because there is a big gap between teams in those places.
that's all
Brandon


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.