Thread: Why change the rules?
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:15
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Why change the rules?
Posted by Jason Leslie, Other on team #157, The Aztechs, from Assabet Valley RTHS and Simplex / EMC / Intel Massachusetts / Ascend .

Posted on 3/28/99 7:13 PM MST


In Reply to: Why change the rules? posted by Tom Lish on 3/28/99 5:54 PM MST:



(((THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT REPRESENT TEAM 157 IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM)))
This is a great point! Although I am in favor of the jump to alliances
because it teaches how to work with someone you may or may not want to
work with. HOWEVER the change to have a tri-chapion is absurd. Personally
I think that the way it is now is fine, if your ally breakes down OH-WELL
we all had to deal with it in the qualifiying matches now didn't we? Tom
made another god point if you want more teams in the final 8 why don't we
up it to a final 12 alliances??? I hope that majority of the teams at the
great lakes regional DO NOT speak for ALL the teams competing in the 1999
FIRST Competition!!! I think the FIRST owes it to all the teams to
contact them asap and get the VOTE from ALL teams....


JAY

GO AZTECS
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.