Thread: Tri-Alliances?
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:16
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tri-Alliances?
Posted by Mike King, Other on team #88, TJē, from Bridgewater Raynham and Johnson & Johnson Professional.

Posted on 3/29/99 9:42 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: Tri-Alliances? posted by Jerry Eckert on 3/29/99 3:27 PM MST:




: I personally don't see how this affects teams who participated in the
: other reginals in any way. I've seen a number of people claim that
: changing the format is unfair to those who competed in other regionals.
: Perhaps someone could elaborate on why this is so?

: I don't see the change as a 'consistency problem', but rather a reaction
: to problems which were noted in some of the other regional contests.
: I applaud FIRST for being willing to change the contest in order to
: fix (or attempt to fix, depending on your point of view) the problems.

: - Jerry

I agree with you Jerry, It doesn't affect the results of the other regionals, because the regionals don't have binding power upon anything except for themselves. I won't start crying foul until the results of the regionals decide who goto the nationals.

Mike King


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.