View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:18
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Is this real evidence or just coincidental?

Posted by Jon, Engineer on team #190, Gompei, from Mass Academy of Math and Science and Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Posted on 3/30/99 11:49 AM MST


In Reply to: I think I have some answers!!!! posted by Jeff Bazydlo on 3/30/99 9:58 AM MST:



Ok, here's another way to look at it...
we are guessing about 220 teams at the nationals, and we are working under the assumption that there will be 2 stages each with 2 fields on it,therefore we have come to the conclusion that 8 teams should be playing at one point and that we can reasonably expect about twice as many Qmatches as at the regionals
for a total close to 170.
this leads into my view:

220 teams / 8 teams per match = 27.5 MPRs (Matches per total Roster), this is the number of matches needed for all the teams to play once (mathematically speaking, of course).
Jeff's theory says that we should get about 6 matches, and 27.5 MPRs * 6 (guessed matches) = 165 matches total!
that's pretty close to the ideal '2X fields = 2X QMs' argument

after turning this in my head so many times i can't tell if i've come up with some definitive results or if i'm just twisting the numbers to fit...



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.