View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-12-2007, 16:14
Mr.G Mr.G is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin
FRC #0326 (Xtreme Eagles / Romulus High School / General Motors)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Romulus
Posts: 244
Mr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Mr.G
Re: FIX-IT WINDOW Proposal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred View Post
I believe it was 2006 that I inquired on Q&A about the topic of those who go to multiple events getting the chance to fiddle with their robots more; the rationale FIRST gave back was that while teams got more time with their robots, they also had far more opportunities to have their robots beat upon on the field. It makes sense--even in a total lovefest like 2001, putting your robot on the field puts your robot at risk of breaking stuff. Teams that compete more will either have to spend more time fixing their robots or spend more weight building more durable parts.
I agree with you, but teams that compete more get allot more gooood practice. I think that is more of an advantage. FIRST Robotics = 50% robot + 50% driver(s). Just my opinion. I just really want the people involved to learn as much as possible, and give them as much time as possible to learn.