Thread: MAJOR TWEAKING
View Single Post
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:36
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: EVERYONE'S RIGHT

Posted by Jerry Eckert, Engineer on team #140 from Tyngsboro, MA High School and New England Prototype/Brooks Automation.

Posted on 4/17/99 11:26 AM MST


In Reply to: EVERYONE'S RIGHT posted by Bill Beatty on 4/16/99 11:17 PM MST:



: Joe, I don't totally agree with you concerning FIRST'S technical inspections.. This year at one of the regionals our Velcro belt was challenged by one of the inspectors. The belt was disallowed because it was listed on the bill material as additional material which allows up to a total of 12 feet of chain or belt -- any combination. We had to revise our bill of material to reflect the cost of a 1 in. wide Velcro loop purchased from Small Parts. Oh well.

If you were using the Velcro as a belt, what was the rationale for disallowing
it as a belt from the additional parts list?

- Jerry

__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.