View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:40
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Let's fix alliance problems, not give it up.

Posted by Tom McKay, Student on team #65, The Huskie Brigade, from Pontiac Northern High School and GM Powertrain.

Posted on 4/27/99 1:52 PM MST


In Reply to: Let's fix alliance problems, not give it up. posted by Jeff Burch on 4/27/99 10:20 AM MST:



If we were still to have alliances next year, I would definitely support this plan. Allies that didn't do anything was one of the reasons that we did so poorly. One question on your idea: what would happen if your ally didn't make inspection? Who would take their place? If they took another robot, that would make for some monster scheduling problems.

Ultimately, I'd like to see the number of regionals a team can go to limited to 2, and take the top 15 teams from each of those regionals to go to the Nationals. That way they could keep the number of teams down, thus eliminating the need for alliances altogether. I know I've seen this idea here before, but I really like it. I know it puts pressure on teams that might not put together the best robot, but that's just more of a challenge to build a better one. Thoughts?

Tom McKay, Team 65


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.