Thread: alliances
View Single Post
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:43
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Three-team alliances?
Posted by Andrew Trax, Coach on team #180, S.P.A.M., from Southfork,Martin Co. High and UTC.

Posted on 5/4/99 3:44 AM MST


In Reply to: Three-team alliances? posted by Eric on 5/3/99 11:19 PM MST:



Unless there were some rule mandating a minimum number of games played rather than
just on the bench, like Little League, some teams would spend very little, if any,
time on the field. Imagine being on a team with a not so great robot and
watching rather than playing. That would be heartbreaking. I'd rather lose
than not try.
But there's no saying what will happen in the future. They may come up
with a game that puts three or more on a alliance AND on the field.





__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.