Thread: Crazy Idea, looking for comments
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:54
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Or we could try the easy way...
Posted by Dan, Other on team #247, da Bears, from Berkley High and PICO/Wisne Design.

Posted on 5/5/99 3:56 AM MST


In Reply to: Or we could try the easy way... posted by Daniel on 5/4/99 9:15 PM MST:



I agree that increased trails would be one way to solve the problem.
However, I think the way q-points are calculated is the problem. I say
improve the ranking system and six rounds would be sufficient.

Flaws that I see with the system:
It favors offensive, high scoring rounds only.
It discriminates against good defensive rounds which turn out to
be important in the elimination tourney.
As a result, sometimes losing outweighs winning.


I have been trying to come up with some ideas for a better ranking system.
If I get something concrete to post, I will.

Dan
#247 da Bears



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.