Thread: pic: Game hint
View Single Post
  #590   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-12-2007, 23:59
T3_1565 T3_1565 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Twitch Drive Designer
FRC #1360
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 854
T3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant futureT3_1565 has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to T3_1565
Re: pic: Game hint

Quote:
Originally Posted by ydnar90 View Post
If the signals are fixed, as you suggest, there will be interference until you are fairly close unless you have something like a tube around the sensor to limit where it gets input from. +/- 40 degrees is quite a range for a signal to be received from, especially with the ability of materials to bounce a signal back into the field. The big problem with IR as a whole is anyone in the stands with a 38khz remote can mess with any robots that are facing toward the stands. I do agree that if emitters are on the field they will be fixed, but that limits it to probably 4 sensors unless there are walls on the field to stop stray IR.

well how many inputs can you have on the board??? 4!

and as for interference, you don't get a good signal to the recieves after about 20 feet max. and really how far are you going to be from the goal to want to know what it is saying, chances are you'll have to be up close

Material bounce may be a problem though.... lol...

And as long as the IR doesn't control the robot but just gives it signals, and FIRST takes into account outside interference, I'm still seeing fixed field emitters as the way to go!
Reply With Quote