View Single Post
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-12-2007, 08:33
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,640
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Contact Area and its Relation to Friction?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
"Recently we did a tire traction experiment . . ."

Loolking at your results, which were for dynamic friction on carpet, the highest effective coefficients of friction were achieved by the IFI wheels, and with the IFI wheels, the highest coefficients of friction were achieved by the wheels with the most lightly loaded contact patches.

In other words, in your tests, for the IFI wheels, for a given weight, more contact area gave more friction. This is a fairly common result for high-traction materials on smooth surfaces. Looks like it could apply on carpet too.
Those results, as you so kindly bolded, were dynamic friction, not static friction. I don't believe anyone here contested more contact area equating to more dynamic friction. The center of the debate, however, was on the relation between contact area and static friction.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.