View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-12-2007, 12:33
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,967
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: 6WD Pros and Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Kevin is right.

It'd be better to go with 6WD, or make two of the four wheels on a 4WD omniwheels. 70/494 had a cool way of doing it in 2006 where the opposite corners were omni's so they weren't as easily rotated by opponents.
Here, I completely disagree.

A well designed 4WD robot can have as much traction as a 6 or 8 or 14 wheel drive robot.

Coefficient of friction is Coefficient of friction. Contact patch size or number of wheels or whether the starts are aligned has nothing to do with traction. The only 2 things that do are Cof (Mu) and maintaining contact with the surface in question.

The only advantage that a 6WD robot can produce is a shorter wheelbase ... and that can be mimic'd on a 4wd robot by driving wide instead of long.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote