View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-12-2007, 18:32
lukevanoort lukevanoort is offline
in between teams
AKA: Luke Van Oort
no team
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,873
lukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond reputelukevanoort has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to lukevanoort
Re: 6WD Pros and Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
Hmmm ... maybe I'm being a dolt here and not understanding.

Each axle on a 6WD robot has 33% of it weight over it (assuming level loading).
Each axle of a 4WD robot has 50% of it's weight over it (again assuming level loading).

A 6WD robot has to overcome the traction of 2 of it's axles in order to turn, or in otherwords overcome (66% of it's weight over wheels x CoF).
A 4WD robot only needs to overcome the traction of 1 of it's axles (or 50% of it's weight over wheels x CoF).

Again, maybe I'm being a dolt here and not seeing the obvious, but why would it be easier to turn against more weight on wheels?

** as a note: this is all theoretical. It assumes many things which in nature just don't happen such as weigh being perfectly distributed over each wheel, the plane that the wheels sit on is perfectly flat, all wheels touch the plane in 1 (and only 1) point, the effective suspension for all wheels are identical, etc **

I
You would be right, but 4WDs turn around their center, and not one pair of wheels. (unless there is something funny with the wheels)
__________________
Team 1219: 2009 - Mentor
Team 587: 2005 - Animator, 2006-2008 - Team Captain
Reply With Quote