Quote:
Originally Posted by lukevanoort
That reminds me of a guy I know; he said that every time he took an AP English practice test (and on the real one) he had to fight an urge to write something about penguins or another massively off-topic subject. (but especially penguins) I think it'd be pretty funny if FIRST did something like that: "Teams are to make an animation about cocobolo and/or naked mole rats. Go Teams!" Even better, something really vague so teams can really flex their creative muscles and we'd get to see a wide variety of animations. Something like "Make an animation relating to the word 'set.' Go Teams!" That would be great, with 464 definitions, I'm sure that would inspire a wide variety of animations.
|
there would be no way of fair judging tho with such a WIDE range of ideas and concepts if it was that vague. It would be fun but its VERY likely that some teams will "female dog" and moan about not winning...
None the less, it would be very fun for it to be as vague as possible, but not everyone has 100% gracious professionalism and will complain about SOMETHING with rules that vague...