View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:14
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: controversial opinion?

Posted by Doug Fischer.

Student on team #41, Warriors, from Watchung Hills and Cordis.

Posted on 7/15/99 3:04 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: controversial opinion? posted by colleen on 7/15/99 1:54 PM MST:



I was at rumble w/o my team and i feel you have a valid point. However, i felt that the DQ of 192 was a bad desicion, becasue of its inconsistency with the rest of the day's calls. Several other teams did similar things and were not even penalized. I felt that either they all should have been DQ'd or none of them because plenty of teams tipped each ohter in the course of some very physical matches. Other teams certainly made similar plays and to just pin a DQ on one of those teams in the quarterfinals was unfair, either it should have been called all day, or not at all.
Doug Fischer


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.