Thread: controversial opinion?
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:15
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
and now for some more!
Posted by Daniel.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Student on team #192, Gunn Robotics Team, from Henry M Gunn Senior High School and NASA Ames.

Posted on 7/15/99 11:20 PM MST


In Reply to: Makes sense... not really, but it evens things out posted by Andy Baker on 7/15/99 10:28 PM MST:



Good point. I feel better about that one now...

So while we're on a roll, lets go on to the next issue. I don't feel any 'rule' should be based on intent. Intent is hard to judge. Is there any other way to make an anti-tipping rule without judging on intent? Perhaps we can figure out a better solution...

Brainstorm time.
-Daniel
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.