Thread: Successful ingredients
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:19
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Reduce the 'down time' by scoring during the match
Posted by Jerry Eckert.

Engineer on team #140 from Tyngsboro, MA High School and New England Prototype/Brooks Automation.

Posted on 8/16/99 2:39 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: Reduce the 'down time' by scoring during the match posted by Greg Mills on 8/16/99 7:28 AM MST:



: :
: : :
: FIRST has refrained from progressive scoring because they wanted something that was still set at the end of the match. Something that the referees wouldn't have to keep track of as the game progressed. Not that I agree but that has been the reply to this question over the years.

Greg,

I'm not sure if I'm misreading your response or if you misread mine.

My suggestion assumed that the scoring would remain static, with the only change being to start the next match (on the other field) while
the scoring is taking place. The score of match n would be announced at the conclusion of match n+1 to avoid drawing attention from the
match in progress.

- Jerry

__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.