Quote:
Originally Posted by lukevanoort
The intent and use of the video is irrelevant. It is still copyrighted material being redistributed (I assume) without the permission of the copyright holder. Intent only matters if it affects FIRST's decision to sue or not, and, if they do, for how much.
|
Okay, it'd be nice if FIRST could clear their copyrighting up a little. I've seen plenty of teams with the FIRST graphics (banners, game logos, all that) on their site. How's the video different from the FIRST logo?