Thread: Seeding Calculations
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 21:55
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
agree w/ that
Posted by colleen.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Other on team Actually, I'm a FIRST-aholic from an undecided team for the year 2000 formerly of Team #126 sponsored by Nypro and Clinton High School.

Posted on 8/30/99 7:13 PM MST


In Reply to: not a fair comparison... posted by Joe Johnson on 8/30/99 5:16 PM MST:




i agree with you there- i understand all teams would have the top and bottom scores dropped.. and yes, i agree that it would leave us all with a more fair seeding.. i guess my disagreement with the whole thing lies in the reward of a multipler for winning the match, maybe that's a little much in unbalancing the scores in way.. i'm not sure..

i have to say, i liked the way seeding went better this year, that it didn't totally rely on the amount of matches won, but something seemed a little odd in the way some of the seedings worked out, and maybe dropping the tops and bottoms would fix that, and/or doing what Jason said and adding 300 or so points instead of tripling... because when you win a match, with say 100 point and then another with 150pts., the difference isn't that large, but when you triple it and it becomes 300 and 450, that's quite a point gap.. at least if you only added 300, the difference in your own scores would still only be 50points (cause it seems many teams may have scored in a close range when you drop the top and bottom, but when you triple those scores, it spreads it way out again)

anyway.. confusing as it is.. that's what i'm thinking..


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.