View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 21:55
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
running averages

Posted by Tom Vanderslice.

Student on team #275, ORHS/AST/Hitachi, from Academy of Science and Technology and Hitachi.

Posted on 8/30/99 9:10 PM MST


In Reply to: running averages... posted by Joe Johnson on 8/30/99 8:19 PM MST:



we really need last years scores...please...anyone...shouldn't FIRST have them somewhere...even if its a computer stored
back somewhere that they have forgotten about...b/c with those...we could take the average after 2-3 rounds and just see
what happened...run a simulation under that scoring system or whatever...

but if you think about it...after say 100 matches...a score over or under the average by 100 pts would affect teh average a
full point...at 200 matches...half a point... (approx)...i don't think there would be a problem with computing running averages
as long as all teams understood what it meant and it was fully explained to everyone...b/c i can see some teams getting
very confused...and also...FIRST couldn't have their scoring system crash in the middle of the last round (or whenever that
was late inte h competition)...b/c the score is a lot more important than...well did this team that was ranked 14th win
they're match...waht did they get...how bout the teams around them...but anyway...i think doing a running average has
potential...

tom



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.