View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2008, 23:43
skimoose's Avatar
skimoose skimoose is offline
Parent/Mentor/Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra
FRC #0228 (GUS)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Meriden, Connecticut
Posts: 568
skimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond reputeskimoose has a reputation beyond repute
Re: R16 Playing Configuration

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Rotolo View Post
I think they mean that no dimension of the robot can ever exceed 80 inches on a plane parallel to the floor. For a square (or cube) manipulator, the corners are the points that stick out the most, and thus need to be controlled.

I like the idea of an 80" diameter cylinder; in fact I hope they bring a big clear plastic one to the competition so I can get trapped inside it...

Don

The corners are the issue I'm raising. Try sketching out the trackball and the robot's frame and bumpers. Even after accounting for the frame under the balls arc, the back of the robot frame barely stays within an 80" cylinder at the frames corners. So if you're planning to grasp the ball you may exceed this cylinder as you reach around the ball.
__________________

2009 CT Regional Motorola Quality Award
2010 VRC Connecticut Championship Winners & Amaze Award
2010 VRC Championship Divisional Energy Award
2010 WPI Regional Winner
2010 WPI Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
2011 WPI Regional Chairman's Award
2012 WPI Regional Finalists