|
liking it..
Posted by colleen.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]
Other on team Actually, I'm a FIRST-aholic from an undecided team for the year 2000 formerly of Team #126 sponsored by Nypro and Clinton High School.
Posted on 8/30/99 9:03 PM MST
In Reply to: statistical bonus points posted by Joe Johnson on 8/30/99 7:33 PM MST:
Dr J
i'm definitely liking your idea. personally, i don't think fair scoring is going to be simple unless you go back to your plain old score being the score, no multiplers, no bonuses, no nothing.. and i think that it's in general agreement that we want something..
and something like what you said would definitely be the answer.. so what that it's not too simple, i really think that could work.. maybe after each match you couldn't figure it out to a T, but you would have an idea based on how well you scored and how well or not your opponent scored, plus, like you said, whether we won or lost, you would never find me trying to figure out our new average, you would find my team watching the leader board waiting for FIRST to tell us..
one question though, which maybe you explained and i missed, even if we play with alliances, would the scores be individual? like the alliance score plus your deviation is what you get credit for, and your partner get's credit for the alliance score and their deviation?
and, no promises, i think our team has all the scores from nationals, i'm working on finding out and will let you guys know once i do..
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
|