View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 21:56
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Some Test Results

Posted by Tom Vanderslice.

Student on team #275, ORHS/AST/Hitachi, from Academy of Science and Technology and Hitachi.

Posted on 9/2/99 9:14 PM MST


In Reply to: not bad... not bad... posted by Joe Johnson on 9/2/99 7:33 PM MST:



Ok...doing the math/some serious excel work on the Chicago Scores

Team # Real Seed PJ Seed Joe Seed
16 1 1 1
239 2 9 9
79 3 12 8
312 4 20 11
148 5 2 3
180 6 7 5
159 7 3 2
179 8 16 20
122 9 8 10
212 10 4 4
10 11 5 7
15 12 18 14
233 13 15 18
278 14 6 6
21 15 13 17
57 16 10 12
132 17 11 13
282 18 14 16
290 19 19 15
267 20 17 22
234 21 27 26
147 22 22 21
218 23 25 25
98 24 23 23
170 25 24 24
285 26 21 19
168 27 26 27

ok...real seed would be how they were seeded at teh tourney...pj seed would be under pj baker's system...joe seed would be
under joe johnson's system...

i just did this so you can look at your team (if you were there) and say...'gee...i think we should use joe's b/c it gave us a
higher seed'...or 'gee..i like hte original way...b/c we did really bad in the toher ones'...or stuff like taht...

plus...i'd rather mess with these numbers than do homework..

So have fun playing with your scores/scoring system...
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.