View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 21:57
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
That's easy

Posted by Raul.

Engineer on team #111, Wildstang, from Rolling Meadows & Wheeling HS and Motorola.

Posted on 9/5/99 11:02 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: What if seeding wasn't solely dependent on scoring? posted by Tom Vanderslice on 9/5/99 10:42 PM MST:



: as good as that sounds...in hockey you are dealing with what? 20 teams...(i'm no hockey expert...i'm from texas...so bear with me...)
: now...that's ok at regionals...now..fast forward to nationals...you have 300 teams...now...how many of htem are 6-0?...5-1?
: how do you seed them??

: tom

Use points for the tie-breaker. You could use the same system for QP's, but make won-loss record the first criteria.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.